Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Psychology Research Seminar

Date: 18 September 2024
Time: 4:00 pm - 5:00 pm
Location: In-person and online

Ethical considerations in qualitative research

David Matthew Edmonds and Olga Zayts-Spence (University of Hong Kong)

Interviewing human research participants involves formal ethical considerations and guidelines around how researchers should manage sensitive issues. Yet, these are abstract suggestions that often have limited relation to how researchers manage sensitive matters during interviews. Our talk addresses the issue of participants talking about the sensitive issue of their mental health diagnoses in research interviews. Our analysis draws on interview data from a wider project on the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on university-to-work transitions. Our dataset comprises 41 interviews with university staff members and 68 interviews with university students. Our analysis focuses on cases wherein participants disclose their mental health diagnoses or those of others during the course of the interviews. We reveal the differences between elicited and spontaneous disclosures and their functions. We pay particular attention to how interviewers responded to these disclosures, which can be conceived of as a continuum from minimal continuers to affiliative understanding to subsequent probe questions. We discuss the implications of our findings for a more communicative ethics—that is, focusing on how sensitive issues are managed in situ during research. In addition, we consider the affordances and constraints upon of the interview methodology for sociolinguistic researchers studying mental health discourse.

In-person: Scott Suite (Edinburgh Business School), Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh; Online: click ‘Join via MS Teams’.