Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Psychology Research Seminar

Date: 5 February 2025
Time: 9:00 am - 10:00 am
Location: Online

The Promise and Challenges of Integrating Multiple Study Designs in Lifespan Developmental Inquiry

Johanna Drewelies (Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin)

Individuals are dynamic systems that have evolved to interact with and adapt to continually changing environments. Lifespan developmental theory suggests that the tremendous heterogeneity in when and how individuals develop is a product of both equifinality and multifinality – multiple paths can lead to the same outcome, and the same paths can lead to different outcomes. Understanding this complexity requires that change be examined simultaneously at different levels of analysis – explicitly linking processes that manifest at one level of analysis with those at other levels of analysis. Using examples from my and others’ work, I illustrate some of the knowledge gained when study designs optimized for observing one or another dynamic are combined and integrated. In particular, I highlight insights gained from designs that link within the same set of persons observations obtained at multiple time scales – microtime (moments, hours, and days), meso-time (weeks and months), and macrotime (years and decades); in different research settings – lab-based experiments (e.g., emotion regulation), in-vivo daily-life assessments (e.g., emotional reactivity), and longitudinal panel inquiry (e.g., health decline); and from multiple entities –individuals, micro-systems (e.g., live-in partners), and macro-systems (e.g., physical, service, and technology characteristics of one’s living environment). In doing so, I will also discuss some of the practical and theoretical challenges researchers face when attempting to study the complex interplay among the many processes that contribute to developmental heterogeneity.

Online: click ‘Join via MS Teams’.